[ad_1]
The United States Senate discussed blockchain voting as an alternative during the Covid 19 pandemic, and in a memo from the legislator highlighted the pros and cons and examined the use of blockchain as a solution to congressional voting
In a memo from The blockthe United States Senate pointed out that the corona virus Covid-19 Has “Major areas of our society are closed, including many functions of Congress”. The problem recurs on the eve of Congress during the pandemic for the new corona virus.
The memorandum, which was part of the “Round table on the continuity of Senate operations and remote voting in times of crisis”, mainly indicates that there is no camera in the congress It has contingency plans that allow it to continue operating remotely. For what they stand out:
This crisis underscores the need for Congress to do its job at a time when it is not safe for members and staff to meet in person.
Blockchain solution between advantages and disadvantages
The event raised the Authentication and encryption to apply as central areas of any technology, though to The block, the blockchain issue did not occur during the round table, they pointed out Every technology must guarantee transparency and securityregarding the possibility that the attackers could infiltrate.
In this way, the notes of Congressmen from United StatesResearch the attributes that make up blockchain “Based on your encrypted distributed ledger”allow a secure general vote and with the possibility to check the correct vote.
Blockchain offers a secure and transparent environment for transactions and without changing the electronic recording of all votes. It also reduces the risk of wrong votes. In addition, some companies have already started to implement blockchain-like technologies to help countries like Estonia run elections entirely online.
However, the document points out as a major concern that the risk of «Majority control of chains falls into the wrong hands»and initially focused on what Each system is configured to eliminate the risk of a 51% attack.
A 51% attack occurs when an actor controls more than half of a network’s computing power and uses that power to exercise control over the blockchain. Remote blockchain voting in the Senate contains possible vulnerabilities for crypto errors and software errors
The discussion is raised because the Senate is likely to return to Washington this weekwhich is worrying since most Those who invent it form an older age group and the risks are high due to the current situation of the pandemic United States.
In addition, the process of The vote on legislation initially depends on considerations and personal contactAccording to the report, what would hinder the introduction of blockchain technology in this process.
Join in telegram y Twitter;; You can also hear ours Podcast
[ad_2]
Add Comment